It has been far too long since I posted a Friday five, here is a mix of things that I have come across lately that interest me.
1. Standing on guard for Canada’s records (Globe & Mail Interview, June 16, 2009)
This article discusses the career and views of Ian Wilson, who served as the first executive to lead Library and Archives of Canada (formed in 2004 after the National Library of Canada and National Archives were merged into a combined institution) and has also served as national archivist of Canada and other positions. I found the comments on digitizing LAC’s collection to be quite interesting. Wilson argues that even if the institution digitizes millions of images per year, this will scratch the surface at best: “Do it for 10 years and it’ll still be about 1 per cent unless we find some way to do a one-time mass-digitization program,” Wilson said). The only way to get everything done is likely to find private support. Seeking private money or other forms of support may be it.
Other interesting items from the interview include the fact that the LAC website records about 1.2 million hits a month on its website (approximately 40,000 per day). LAC has also acquired the reputation of responding very quickly to Access to Information requests which strikes me as great: showing leadership on access by doing it well. The one disappointment (or perhaps it would be better to put it as “incomplete goal”) Wilson refers to is his effort to start a national portrait gallery. After visiting Washington DC and London, the lack of such an institution in Canada is unfortunate.
2. Wiki Patterns (learned about this at a SLA Toronto “Best of the Web” event this week; thanks to Daniel Lee)
I have been looking for something like Wiki Patterns for quite some time; this resource explains which social patterns can contribute (or undermine) the successful use of a wiki. One successful strategy to encourage wiki use is “Barn Raising” where everybody focuses on a single project. In contrast, there are anti-patterns such as Gate which slows down contributions by having too many processes. As somebody that uses wikis regularly, this looks helpful.
3. Value Based Management (learned about this at a SLA Toronto “Best of the Web” event this week; thanks to Daniel Lee)
This resource is dictionary to management concepts and buzz words. If somebody mentions something you’ve never heard of in a meeting or document, then you can get a basic definition here. I looked up something I had heard about recently – Six Sigma – and learned that this technique is ultimately concerned with the identification of defects in processes and eliminating these as much as possible. New terms in business books and writing occur so often that it can be difficult to keep up.
4.Facebook and academic performance: reconciling a media sensation with data by Josh Pasek, eian more and Eszter Hargittai (First Monday, May 2009)
This article looks a study that made the rounds earlier this year arguing about the supposedly negative effects of Facebook use on students. My post about Facebook and grades (and workplace productivity) has been among the most popular I’ve written here. Here is part of the abstract of the article: “In none of the samples do we find a robust negative relationship between Facebook use and grades. Indeed, if anything, Facebook use is more common among individuals with higher grades. We also examined how changes in academic performance in the nationally representative sample related to Facebook use and found that Facebook users were no different from non–users.” This happens to support my general view – Facebook is not uniquely good or bad, it is just another form of social media that people use.
The author’s articles put this analysis (that linked FB use to poor grades) in part of a decades old academic tradition that focuses on the negative effects of media on young people. Back in the 1930s, some argued that movies were ruining children. It seems this idea comes up every few years whenever something new type of leisure is created, especially if that type is popular among young people. If it isn’t TV, it is comics or the Internet or video games. Old ideas like this die hard. I would hope greater awareness of this history should increase our collective skepticism.
5. Global Entertainment and Media Outlook: 2009-2013 (PricewaterhouseCoopers)
While the full text of this report is not available for free, there are some interesting items available. There is a video that provides an overview of the sector that I found interesting. “The pace of digital migration is increasing significant as a result about the recession.” I’m still waiting to see this impact book publishers and newspapers (most of the newspapers I read have no active plans to drop their print editions). There is also an observation that old concepts like “prime time” are gone in an era when users drive demand. As the video puts it, “monetizing [digital] demand is a struggle.” I still haven’t seen much in the way of robust new business models that sustain digital media that could support the staff of a major magazine or publisher.
